Infrastructure Bill Would Mandate Alcohol Monitors for All New Cars

Infrastructure Bill Would Mandate Alcohol Monitors for All New Cars

The more than $1 trillion infrastructure package would require that alcohol monitors be placed in all new cars.

Within the 2,700-page infrastructure proposal is a section that mandates new vehicles have “a system that … passively and accurately detect[s] whether the blood alcohol concentration of a driver of a motor vehicle is equal to or greater than the blood alcohol concentration” of 0.08, which is generally the limit to drive in most states.

If the driver has a higher than 0.08 blood alcohol concentration, the car’s system would “prevent or limit motor vehicle operation.”

It’s not clear whether the alcohol-detection system would have to be a breathalyzer, which requires a driver to blow into a device, or something else.

Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) recommends that cars have a “driver monitoring system” including “touch-based systems that can read your blood alcohol concentration through your fingertips and air-sampling systems that can test and isolate just the air exhaled by the driver,” according to a report from the group.

Some convicted drunk drivers are required to use devices attached to an ignition interlock before starting their vehicles.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) said last year in a study that alcohol-detection systems that prevent impaired driving could save upward of 9,000 lives annually.

Drunk driving deaths cost the United States $44 billion in economic costs and $210 billion in comprehensive societal costs, according to a 2010 study. U.S. police departments arrest about 1 million people a year for alcohol-impaired driving, IIHS said.

Of the 36,096 traffic fatalities in 2019, there were an estimated 10,142 people killed in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, according to federal data.

The infrastructure bill would require the U.S. Transportation Department to set a technology safety standard within three years—and then give automakers at least another two years to comply—as long as new requirements are “reasonable, practicable, and appropriate.”

“Twenty years ago, this technology didn’t exist,” Jason Levine of the Center for Auto Safety told The Verge. “[But] we have the technology available now. We can install tech in vehicles that helps to monitor whether someone is impaired and stops that person from hurting themselves or others.”

The bill has not yet passed the Senate but has already cleared several procedural hurdles in late July. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D.-N.Y.) said this week that the final vote on the measure could happen Wednesday. However, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) warned Democrats that he might block the package if it’s rushed.

“This is an extremely important bipartisan bill,” McConnell told reporters Tuesday. “There’s an excellent chance it will be a bipartisan success story for the country, and to try to truncate an amendment process on something of this magnitude, I think it’s a mistake.”

Reuters contributed to this report.

Jack Phillips

Senior Reporter

Jack Phillips is a reporter at The Epoch Times based in New York.

Source link

About the author: NEO Common Era
Tell us something about yourself.

Get involved!

Get Connected!
Come and join our community. Expand your network and get to know new people!


No comments yet